Rhode Island Casinos

CASINO NEWS

June 23, 2009
Twin River casino seeks bankruptcy

Twin River filed for bankruptcy today in hopes to restructure and rid its heavy debts. The casino has 4,700 slot machines, roulette tables, and live greyhound racing, and employs more than 800 people. In its filing the casino listed assets of between $100 million and $500 million, and other assets of between $500 million to $1 billion

The papers filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island state "Twin River's remaining revenues are simply insufficient to fund operations and to service the interest payments on the approximately $589 million in secured debt incurred to acquire and upgrade their facilities."

The casino said the live greyhound racing has operated at a loss, and it hopes the state legislature will repeal the statutory requirement to have it.

November 3, 2008
U.S. Supreme Court hears case over Narragansett land

PROVIDENCE – The Supreme Court will decide whether the U.S. secretary of the interior can hold tribal land in trust under the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, when the tribe was not recognized by the federal government until after 1934.

This specific case involves the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island, who purchased 31 acres in Charlestown in 1991 to be used be used for "economic development" and housing for the elderly and poor. While construction began on an elderly housing complex, the state sued to stop the tribe from placing the land into federal trust which would exclude it from most state and local laws. State officials feared the tribe would eventually build a casino or create a tax-free zone.

Today the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Several hundred other tribes that were recognized after 1934 will be affected by the outcome of this case. The Bush administration agrees with the tribe and argues the 1934 act allows it to take land into trust to benefit American Indians regardless of when their tribes were recognized. Twenty one states side with Rhode Island and want the Supreme Court to limit that authority arguing that states lose control over tribal trust land within their own borders.

The court will also decide whether a 1978 land settlement between the Narragansett and Rhode Island puts limits on new trust lands in the state.

For more information about the Narragansett, visit www.narragansett-tribe.org.
 

February 25, 2008
Supreme Court will hear Narragansett Tribe v. Rhode Island

PROVIDENCE - The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a land dispute between the Narragansett Indian Tribe and Rhode Island. The justices will decide whether land purchased by the tribe in 1991 should be governed by Rhode Island law or tribal and federal law.

The Narragansett have tried for years to build an Indian casino in southern Rhode Island. They would like to derive financial success similar to Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun in neighboring Connecticut.

In 1978 the tribe received 1,800 acres of land in a legal settlement that subjected the parcel to state and local control and a state ban on casinos. In 1996 the U.S. Congress banned the Narragansetts from applying under federal law to build a casino on that land without state approval.

However, the case before the Supreme Court is based on 31 acres in Charlestown that the tribe purchased in 1991 to build housing for their elderly. This land is not part of the 1978 settlement. The tribe would like the U.S. Department of Interior to take this land into federal trust, which effectively removes it from state and local control.

The state argues that the federal government cannot take land into trust for tribes recognized after the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act unless they meet certain ancestry requirements or Congress specifically authorizes it. Rhode Island lawyers argue that since the Narragansetts were not federally recognized until 1983, they cannot place their land into trust unless Congress allows it.

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston rejected the state's case last July. The Supreme Court will now review the case sometime later this fall. Their decision could impact on tribes throughout the country by changing the status of tribal land, especially newly acquired lands.

Rhode Island voters rejected a proposed amendment to the state constitution in 2006 that would have allowed the Narragansett tribe and Las Vegas-based Harrah's Entertainment to operate a casino in West Warwick.
 

January 10, 2008
Proposal to Legalize Rhode Island Casinos

PROVIDENCE – State Representative William San Bento plans to file a legislative bill to legalize two resort casinos in Rhode Island. He will propose expanding the Twin River and Newport Grand slot parlors with table games, restaurants, and hotels.

"It'll put us a step ahead of what may happen in Massachusetts," San Bento said.

The measure requires a constitutional amendment, so if it is passed by the General Assembly in this legislative session and signed by the governor, it could appear on voter ballots this coming November.

San Bento filed another bill last week to allow the two slot parlors to stay open 24 hours everyday. That proposal is on the fast track and could be voted on within the next few weeks.

In the November 2007 election, the residents of Lincoln, RI voted 65% against 24-hour gambling at Twin River in a non-binding measure. Sixty percent opposed the expansion of casino gambling at Twin River.
 

October 5, 2007
24 Hour Gambling Proposed

PROVIDENCE – State Senator Paul Moura will introduce legislation to allow 24-hour gambling at the state's two licensed slot parlors, Twin River and Newport Grand. Moura says his state will need these changes to counter the impact when Massachusetts builds its casinos.